News: Brands Falling Foul of OnLine Laws
RESEARCH SHOWS BRANDS MAY BE FALLING FOUL OF LAWS ONLINE
- 81% rate their knowledge of social media marketing law as limited or non-existent
- BBC, NHS Choices, Gumtree and FutureGov unite to share best practice
London, February 25th 2010:
Research from moderation company Tempero, shows 81% of brands rate knowledge of laws regulating their social media marketing as limited to non-existent. The number one reason cited for low knowledge was that company activity was limited to external platforms like Facebook and Twitter, but a UK solicitor cautioned against this misconception.
Danvers Baillieu, solicitor at Winston & Strawn, who specialises in representing web based companies such as Huddle and Zoombu , and runs Bootlaw, clarified:
“If you edit or run a group or community, even if you’re not responsible for the hosting of content (such as a Flickr group), then choosing not to exercise control and ignoring requests to remove defamatory or illegal content would not be a defence to any claims brought against you.”
10 year UGC veterans Tempero, which says it protects more blue chip brands online than any other moderation company, is pro-actively tackling brand confusion on legitimate social marketing with the launch of a free eBook called ‘UGC and the law’.
Link to e-book: Law: user generated content

