At the recent Digital Marketing Show, I was roped into singing for this. It may only be a few seconds each, but I’m at 2 mins 13 and 2 mins 29 (in the out-takes). Unfortunately my singing career is limited to a single word – albeit a very important one! – “Food”.
The video is for the Beyond Food Foundation, which will be working with homeless people – I’ll share a link for you to take a peek when their site goes live. In the meantime, you can find the Beyond Food Foundation on Facebook.
I am now a different – and more complete – me. At long last I have my own Google + name: https://plus.google.com/+ClaireThompson/. I don’t know how long it’s been there, but I spotted it yesterday, and I’m delighted.
I’m particularly pleased to have my full name as there are loads of Claire Thompson’s in the World: it’s a bit like being called John Smith. I’d have settled for ClaireatWaves, and was resigned to becoming +ClaireThompson5697 or similar when my turn arrived.
I really didn’t expect to have my name, especially as there is a relatively ‘new kid on the blog’, another Claire Thompson, who came along after me, but is working in the social media space as well – and unlike this blog that has been around for a few years and is not as loved as I’d like it to be, hers is a lovely new site. (Another note to self to sort it out, but client work always seems to come first!)
Enough of the witter. Thank you, Google, for giving me my new URL. As soon as the phone is sorted, my new business cards will wear it with pride!
This blog has been silent for almost a month, somewhat accidentally courtesy of some unexpected broadband problems, awkward utilities, spammers and a move. But I’m back, and raring to go!
Despite promises to the contrary, our phone number couldn’t come with us. The new telephone number for Waves PR is: 0118 978 6086.
The office is now based just outside of Reading in Bearwood (Sindlesham) – close to Wokingham. If you’re in the area, do call and arrange a coffee!
Last week, on BBC Breakfast, Charlie Stayt asked the departing Blue Peter presenter, Helen Shelton, whether she was leaving because she was too old for the adrenalin driven lifestyle required of Blue Peter presenters. I can’t get strung up about him asking- there is, after all, a limit to how long you want to go on putting yourself in danger (although I rather suspect that Charlie is lucky to have got away with a question like that).
Shelton’s response was sensible. Having been there for five years, she didn’t want to be the one saying “this is how we usually do it” – she didn’t want to stand in the way of innovation or change and has a million other ambitions to achieve. The drive she shows leaves us in no doubt that she will succeed.
A few years ago, someone I knew from my PR agency days during the dot com boom asked me to come in for a chat about leading their social media division. We had never met in person, but knew of each other – she could see the results of the work I was doing online and asked me to come and see her. As I walked through the door, her chin fell. She was, she declared before I’d sat down, looking for someone younger. Someone who really gets social media.
It’s only now I can laugh (I’m really not THAT old).
People may need a hand to set up Twitter accounts, physically create Facebook pages etc. , but that’s not something that’s age dependent. That’s skill dependent. She’d asked me in because she knew I could do the job, so why age was an issue for her I’ll never know. I wasn’t disappointed. If she allows old fashioned age and gender stereotypes decide her recruitment and marketing future, I doubt the agency will be the kind of place that does the best work.
So, wounds licked, I was delighted to spot this conversation on Quora this week. What do people in Silicon Valley plan to do once they hit 35 and are officially over the hill? And look who waded in: the founders of some of the most successful ‘new media’ properties around, and references to ‘older’ founders from Wikipedia to LinkedIn. And Robin Chase knocked the questioner into a cocked hat:
I founded Zipcar when I was 42.
GoLoco when I was 47.
Buzzcar when I was 52.
Veniam when I was 54.
The questioner can’t be blamed for asking the question. With some great notable exceptions (the ones who really know which startups are on the block) the media covers youthful startups, the guys in the garage who are millionaires by the age of 25. What we all tend to forget is that the media covers what is exceptional or new, not what is ordinary. And, of course, they are fed by the PR industry.
The message to all PR people has to be to break out of the traditional demographics jail if they haven’t already. Old fashioned demographics mean that we define people by their income, status, age etc, when in fact their propensity to do something is far more useful – for them and the communicator.
Companies that stay stuck in old fashioned age, income etc approaches will increasingly find themselves quickly consigned to the history books. Blackberry/RIM’s technology was world leading - in the 2010 Haiti earthquake emergency, its technology kept on working where others failed, and it’s security functions were good enough to really irritate regimes that didn’t like not being able to listen in. Having seen their marketing team’s adherence to old fashioned segmentation and demographics, and their lack of ‘social’ understanding and customer care, is anyone surprised that they find themselves in their current position?
Engage with ‘me’ – whoever I may be, online or offline, marketing/selling or talking – on the basis of my interests, ability, knowledge, understanding and networks and there’s a chance I may respond.
However irritating their approaches may be at times, both Google and Facebook are doing really rather well off that approach. Mary Quant shops in Zara. Granny can sky dive if she wants to. Grandad can look after the kids. Perhaps it’s time for any PR laggards to catch up with the law, which is, itself, always behind the curve, and kick ‘age’ back into the dark ages where it belongs.